Quatro Casino recenzia

Hráči zo Spojených štátov amerických nie sú akceptovaní
4.6 Rating
Otázna
Reputácia
Hráči zo Spojených štátov amerických nie sú akceptovaní
Otázna
Reputácia
 

Tím Casino Guru zhodnotil kasíno Quatro Casino po dôkladnej analýze sťažností hráčov a obchodných podmienok kasína. Bohužial reputáciu kasína musíme hodnotiť ako podpriemernú pretože sme našli pomerne vysoké množstvo sťažností týkajúcich sa problémov pri výbere výhier alebo porušenia obchodných podmienok, ktoré nie sú vždy vyriešené k spokojnosti hráčov. Kým sa kasíno nezlepší a nebudeme môcť upravit naše hodnotenie, odporúčame hrať v kasínach s lepšie hodnotenou reputáciou. Prečítajte si celú recenziu s podrobnými informáciami o týchto sťažnostiach, procese výberov alebo Quatro Casino bonusov.

Residents from
Spojené štáty americké
Not accepted
IP adresa
Spojených štátov amerických
Not blocked
Používanie
VPN
Povolené
Jazyk
webstránky
anglicky (+5)
Live Chat
Language
anglicky (+5)
Email Support
Language
anglicky (+5)
Bonus bez vkladu
Not available
Vstupný bonus
Not available
Spôsoby platby
Výrobcovia hier
Vlastník
Technology Services Trading Ltd
Založené
2009
Limit výberu
Neobmedzený
Licenčný orgán
Kahnawake
Dobrá
Interesting Facts
  • Patrí k skupine CasinoRewards
  • Maximálny limit výberu je €4000 týždenne
Pozitíva
  • Dobrá reputácia od založenia v roku 2009
Negatíva
  • Hry iba od jedného výrobcu hier – Microgamig

Complaints about Quatro Casino and related casinos (8)

We have conducted extensive research on the we and as a result we have found following 8 complaints on Quatro Casino or any brands that might be interconnected with it. Taking into account seriousness and credibility of these complaints and estimated size of casino revenues we decided to give Quatro Casino a Otázna reputation.

Otázna reputácia kasína
Direct complaints about Quatro Casino casino
Uncertain case, good regulator
Obvinenie z dupliciného účtu, skonfiškovaný celý zostatok.
 
This complaint is from 2015
Disputed amount: 150 € (bonus money)
Read more on: latestcasinobonuses.com
Read more
Complaints on related Yukon Gold Casino (Same affiliate)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
Terms breach, deposit returned.
The customer had wanted to withdraw their money from the casino, but the casino seized the winnings and paid out only the deposit, citing a breach of their terms. No side provided conclusive evidence and the case had been elevated to an authority with no further information provided.
 
This complaint is from 5/2015
Disputed amount: Can$540 (skutočné peniaze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Zodiac Casino (Same affiliate)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
Bonus terms breached, funds seized.
The customer had wanted to withdraw their winnings from the casino but the casino seized them, citing a breach of terms. Neither side provided conclusive evidence and there has been no further progress in this case.
 
This complaint is from 7/2015
Disputed amount: £750 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Luxury Casino DK (Same affiliate)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
Accusation of duplicate account, all winnings confiscated.
Player complained that once he asked for a withdrawal it was approved and then declined. Casino replied that it was forbidden to have duplicate accounts. Player denied this, the case was apparently passed to a gambling commission authority. No update since then.
 
This complaint is from 9/2015
Disputed amount: £450 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Nostalgia Casino (Same affiliate)
Stupid excuse or fraud
Black points: 500
The player was accused of having a duplicate account.
However, the casino did not show any proof or the evidence that the player had duplicate accounts.
 
This complaint is from 6/2015
Disputed amount: 200 $ (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Insufficient evidence from casino
Black points: 250
Again the player was accused of having duplicate accounts.
Because of terms, the casino had the right to asked for notary proven documents, The player argued he is only asking for his 100$ winning and notary proof of the documents cost 50$. After he sent then the notary prove they did not answer. No update since.
 
This complaint is from 5/2014
Disputed amount: 100 € (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Phoenician Casino (Same affiliate)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
Terms breached, winnings confiscated.
The customer played with a bonus offered by the casino and won, but when they tried to withdraw their money, the casino seized the money and closed their account on an alleged breach of their terms, creating multiple accounts specifically. There had been no evidence to support either side and the case escalated to the Gaming Commision. No further information is available.
 
This complaint is from 9/2015
Disputed amount: £450 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more
Complaints on related Luxury Casino (Same affiliate)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Black points: 100
Accusation of duplicate account, all winnings confiscated.
Player complained that once he asked for a withdrawal it was approved and then declined. Casino replied that it was forbidden to have duplicate accounts. Player denied this, the case was apparently passed to a gambling commission authority. No update since then.
 
This complaint is from 9/2015
Disputed amount: £450 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Read more

Have you found a relevant complaint about this casino, or do you have personal bad experience? Help others and submit your complaint.

Odoslať sťažnosť
* Uvádzame iba sťažnosti, pri ktorých došlo k porušeniu nášho kódexu férového gamblingu.

Quatro Casino spôsoby platby

Quatro Casino hry

Automaty
Ruleta
Video poker
Bingo
Blackjack
Baccarat
Craps
Keno
Stieracie žreby

Quatro Casino výrobcovia hier